I have not taken the vaccine. There are various reasons behind my decision but my main reason consist of taking a stance against the vaccine pass. Many accusations have been hurled against me and others who are taking similar stances. But in this post I will demonstrate why there is a reasonable concern regarding the vaccine mandates.
We have been manipulated from the start of this pandemic into accepting the tyrannical rule of the future. And the evidence for this is not even in secret but in the history of our past three years. Now they attempt to bury their trail by hiding it from social media through the banning of certain users, of certain videos, and with the promotion of so-called “Fact-checkers”.
Here I will present my arguments, with sources, as to why we should take a stand against the Vaccine Pass/ID.
They Lied To Us About The Pass
Months before the apparent start of the pandemic, Bill Gates had been active propagating his anti-pandemic plan at a conference (Event 201) and with his new product the ID2020. The theory being that this ID would serve as a health tracker that would be used as a pass for people to access goods.
SOURCES: https://id2020.org/ ; https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about ; https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay7162
So when the COVID pandemic started and it first reached the western world, this conference went viral as it was shared, mostly, by what we now know as “conspiracy theorists”. They had been connecting the dots: the convenient time in which the pandemic started with the introduction of digital vaccine trackers. Hence, they theorized that this pandemic was going to serve as an excuse to introduce this “ID-2020” technology.
In response to increasing concerns regarding “health passes” and compulsory vaccination, many leaders around the world promised that there would be no covid pass in the future. And the mainstream media then classified proponents of this theory as “conspiracy theorists” bent on spreading misinformation.
SOURCES: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55193939 ; https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/07/politics/biden-vaccine-passport-fact-check/index.html
Two years later now and we find that although the virus is more controlled than at other points in the past, governments all around the world are actually twisting our arms with increasing force. And the star of these measures is the very thing they denied at the beginning: a dreaded COVID PASS.
SOURCES: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/30/europe/covid-vaccine-mandates-austria-europe-cmd-intl/index.html ; https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-appeals-court-reinstates-covid-19-vaccine-or-test-rule-us-workplaces-2021-12-18/ ; https://www.forbes.com/sites/suzannerowankelleher/2021/12/06/digital-vaccine-passes-united-states/?sh=49e02cc21463
Therefore, we can clearly see that the “fact-checkers” were wrong and that our leaders blatantly lied to us by saying they would not force the vaccine on us, or enact vaccine passes. Furthermore, they have been slowly adjudicating more and more power to these vaccine passes by eliminating alternatives such as negative COVID tests.
Why have they done this in this manner? Well, I am sure that if they had introduced these overly restrictive and forceful measures at the beginning few would have accepted them. Hence, they have lied and been slow to show their hand in order to get the masses to compromise on smaller changes that would then accumulate into the drastic change they desired in the first place. This tactic has been described with expert conciseness by Dr. Jordan B. Peterson, a psychologist who has studied totalitarian movements:
They Have Lied About the Nature of the Virus
In the countless debates I have seen online regarding the use of the “trust the science” slogan, many people have exposed the numerous times in which this so-called “science” has changed. In response to this evident truth, some have attempted to counter-argue by saying that, well, change is in the nature of science.
With new discoveries, the scientific consensus changes; some measures are retracted and other enacted due to evolving information. This, of course, presents natural questions regarding trust. Why should we trust the so-called consensus if a further discovery could change things all over again?
There is plenty to debate here but I don’t want to go down this route. Instead, I want to show evidence that strongly suggest that many of the changes in the fabricated “scientific consensus”, have not been motivated by solid information but by public relations, politics, and other corporate concerns.
At the beginning of the pandemic, videos were surfacing on the internet of people in China collapsing in public places as an apparent consequence of an emerging epidemic. As the news of this virus reached the rest of the world and it became apparent that we had reason to worry, people began to be strongly concerned. Logically, this began to affect the relationship between China and the rest of the world (business, travels, etc.). Money and diplomacy were at stake.
So, on January 14, 2020, the WHO tried to calm us down. They said that, contrary to popular belief at the time, there was no evidence that the COVID-19 virus could be transmitted from human to human.
Interestingly enough, one day later the first case of COVID-19 appeared in the United States. But the most appalling part was that “conspiracy theorists” on internet forums noticed that China had been silencing Chinese doctors who had been sounding the alarm. Surely, the WHO and many governments around the world must have had the same information that random people on 4Chan and Reddit had. And yet, the Chinese whistleblowers were dismissed.
SOURCE: https://www.axios.com/timeline-the-early-days-of-chinas-coronavirus-outbreak-and-cover-up-ee65211a-afb6-4641-97b8-353718a5faab.html?fbclid=IwAR3LCWl6upHI7zONkkuB9g5dUCA05HFQGv0rXxYpyXKg32KbGX7C9dKMzVI ; https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51403795
As it was becoming apparent that the WHO was wrong, or perhaps deceiving, and that human-to-human viral spread was indeed a reason for concern, President Trump decided to BAN travel from China (with the logical exception of US-Citizens and their spouses who would have otherwise remained stuck overseas).
SOURCE: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/4/23/a-timeline-of-the-trump-administrations-coronavirus-actions ref January 31
Because it was Trump who did this (and it was election year), the Democrats and most of the MSM blasted the president saying that his measure was bigoted and xenophobic.
SOURCES: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/yes-biden-called-trumps-travel-restrictions-xenophobic/ ; https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1223727977361338370?s=20 ; https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2020/04/24/trumps-immigration-ban-is-another-page-in-the-long-story-of-xenophobia-in-america/
On February, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi encouraged mass celebrations in San Francisco’s Chinatown. At other places we had mass hug campaigns and such. Did viral transmission matter? Not more than politics.
SOURCE: https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/nancy-pelosi-visits-san-franciscos-chinatown/2240247/
In time, however, people panicked. By the time the WHO admitted there was human-to-human transmission, people were hoarding masks. There was this idea that surgical masks could actually provide protection from an airborne virus in a pandemic. As far as I know, hazmat suits and very specific type of masks provide significant protection against these kind of biological agents, not surgery masks. But many didn’t think too much about this, they desired their surgical masks (and toilet paper).
SOURCE: https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/29/health/coronavirus-mask-hysteria-us-trnd/index.html
Now, because there was an abnormal demand in surgical masks, factories couldn’t keep up and doctors at hospitals were suffering from the shortage. In order to stop this madness, Dr. Fauci came out and told everyone that surgical masks barely worked to stop a virus such as the COVID-19 and that the masks were better left for the surgeons and hospital workers.
Did Dr. Fauci lie to us or did he give us incorrect information due to sheer ignorance? If the masks did indeed provide significative protection from COVID-19, would he have said so knowing that it would put the hospital workers in a worse situation? Let’s think about this for a moment. It should be obvious to us that authorities give or conceal information from the masses as they see fit in order to control them. Once the hospital mask crisis was averted, Dr. Fauci gave surgical masks a go.
And what about The Chinese Virus That Came From China?
Calling COVID-19 the Chinese virus plays on the same thread as the calling of the Spanish flu (Influenza), the Mexican swine flu in 2008-2009 or the Russian/St-Petersburg flu. But Trump was saying it, and it was election year. And as I’ve previously said: for some people, politics matter more than other people. Anything that Trump went on to affirm about the virus, whether it was true or not, was going to be blasted by Democrats, the MSM and the major social media platforms.
So, when Trump spoke about the possibility of the virus coming out of a laboratory in Wuhan, the Ministry of Truth was quick to deny it. I am talking, of course, of the mighty fact-checkers. And the Ministry said that the lab leak theory was nothing more than good ol’ conspiracy nonsense juice. They had effectively “debunked it”.
SOURCE: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/09/conspiracies-covid-19-lab-false-pandemic
However, once the election was over and President Biden arrived at the White House, there was a small flip in the narrative. It turns out that the US government was actually investigating a leak at the Wuhan Lab and that this theory was indeed a serious possibility. It is now clear that MSM dismissed this theory at the beginning simply because it came from Trump’s administration. Did the truth matter to these journalists? Not more than politics.
Remember: The MSM told us that the “Science CLEARLY showed that the Lab Leak theory is false” but the science conveniently changed. Yet, this is the type of scientific consensus that we are supposed to trust.
There is Distrust in the Vaccine
All around the world, there have been major protests against the vaccine mandates. Most of them have not been televised. (Remember when it was said that the revolution would not be televised?) MSM has worked hard to censor and cover up any “anti-vax” movement. Social Media Lords began to place more and more of their elected fact-checkers under vaccine posts and are now outright banning accounts and taking down posts that express “anti-vax” sentiments. There are not two sides to this argument to them. It is their side the only one that counts, and any dissenting view must by relentlessly squished.
But why are people engaging in mass protests? Well, many of these protests are not against the vaccine per se but against the vaccine mandate. Some people simply see that vaccine IDs are problematic and unethical. Others, simply distrust the COVID vaccine itself but have no problem with other vaccines. Should the government force them to be injected with their product anyway? Well…
When Trump enacted Operation Warp Speed, in order to significantly advance the speed in which the COVID-19 Vaccine was developed, the Democrat party strongly opposed it. Some claimed that rushing the vaccine was a reason for distrust, implying that the cure could be worse than the disease.
SOURCES: https://gop.com/research/biden-repeatedly-undermined-the-vaccine/ ; https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-questions-whether-coronavirus-vaccine-will-be-real ; https://twitter.com/CNNSotu/status/1302280854199308288
However, once the Democrats came into power, they embraced the product of Operation Warp Speed and are now forcing the very vaccine they distrusted into the arms of their people. What’s screwed up about this is that they themselves doubted the vaccine for their own reasons and now act as if people didn’t have the right to distrust the vaccine for any reason whatsoever. This is plain evil.
Yes, “the science” changes. But then why am I obligated to trust your ever-changing consensus? When the vaccines began to be distributed, the oh-so-wise health authorities declared that vaccinated people could stop wearing masks and return to normalcy. Quite an incentive for a people who had to give up their routines, who had not been able to meet with family members, who couldn’t celebrate a birthday or, even worse, participate in the burial of a loved one or even say goodbye to them in their deathbed.
Sources: https://www.voanews.com/a/covid-19-pandemic_cdc-says-vaccinated-people-can-go-back-normal-life/6205791.html ; https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/553387-cdc-vaccinated-people-can-return-to-normal-life
Many took the vaccine. And after this initial wave was vaccinated, the health authorities came out with yet another convenient change. “The science” had discovered something new: the vaccines do not prevent the transmission of the virus. Therefore, vaccinated people still need to wear masks and are still unable to return to normalcy.
But a new problem arises for The Authorities: the vaccination rates are low, some people simply don’t want to “take the jab”. How do we get those cornered? How do we push them towards vaccination? Well, it was decided that some benefits belonged to the vaccinated, such as eating in restaurants, even if they could still spread the virus. And then they would make life hell for the unvaccinated by banishing them from even more social opportunities, even necessary ones like going to the doctor.
The naïve will say this is not how they think about these matters despite the mountain of evidence that exposes their trickery. But I mean… look at this:
Now, if the vaccine doesn’t work quite as they expected it to work, then how can I trust that the third and fourth booster will work as they expect it? How can we trust the vaccine when the health authorities behind it have not earned our trust? Well, their tactics have worked to a great degree since vaccination rates are now much higher.
But were people wrong to doubt the AstraZeneca vaccine?… The authorities don’t seem to be on such a firm ground when they are retiring vaccines from the market due to suspicion of blood clots. Of course, no medical treatment is without risks, but this is exactly why we must be allowed to choose.
While it is hard to know how many people have died due to the vaccines, and it is likely to be a tiny percentage, the fact of the matter is that people have actually died because of them. And when the governments are twisting our arms into compliance, who should be held responsible for these deaths? Shouldn’t people be free to choose, considering individual risk and benefits, what medical treatment to take? Shouldn’t we face the consequence of our free actions and not the consequence of the actions we were forced to take?
Sources: https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/pfizer ; https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/two-die-japan-after-shots-suspended-moderna-vaccines-japan-govt-2021-08-28/ ; https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/italy-ban-astrazeneca-batch-follows-two-deaths-sicily-source-2021-03-11/
The Consensus is Fabricated
Who are these authorities anyway? Who are these that are anointed by the government and the international agencies? See, some people say that instead of trusting the conspiracy libertarian aunt from Facebook, we should trust those who have been trained in the field and have received their golden PHDs.
But having a PHD is only an indicator of knowledge, not of wisdom or honesty. I don’t think that the distrust in the vaccine is simply because people think that the scientists at Pfizer are dead from the head up. So that argument just doesn’t take much flight.
However, when we notice that the so called “scientific consensus” is based on a selection of chosen experts then we must ask ourselves: what about the rest of them? The government and the MSM wants to pretend that the consensus means that all health experts around the world agree on the same thing. And they achieve this illusion by forbidding a certain group of health experts from giving their takes on TV.
But the truth is that many relevant experts have been sounding the alarm on the vaccine mandates and the vaccines themselves. Some have argued that certain treatments are more effective than the vaccines, others that the vaccines can be dangerous for certain categories of people, and others simply believe that many of the measurements such as lockdowns have been worse for the public health than the virus itself.
Here is a list of only some of the most popular Doctors who have put their careers on the line to speak out against the scientific dictatorship:
– Pr. Didier Raoult (Marseilles, France): World recognized epidemiologist. Offered different treatment early on, very cheap and well-known, with limited side effects.
– Dr. Martin Blachier (France): changed his opinion on wide vaccination and vaccination of children.
– Dr. Benoît Ochs (Luxembourg): is banned from exercising his profession for providing a treatment to his patients. None of them died. He claims to have cured over 700 of people with it.
– Dr. Robert Malone: a medical doctor and an infectious-disease researcher and contributor to the creation of mRNA technology (used for vaccines)
– Dr. Jean-Michel Claverie (France): virologist who opposes vaccination of children and thinks they’d benefit better from natural immunity.
– Dr. de Chazournes: spoke up during protests about side effects of the vaccine and against the pass.
-Dr. Peter A. McCullough (Texas): an American cardiologist. He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University. Says that vaccine interest has been favored over more effective treatment plans.
-Pr. Bret Weinstein (Los Angeles): evolutionary biologist. He believes we have been lied about the efficacy of the vaccines and is against their mandate.
These are just a few of the health experts that have tried to have their voice heard but have been vilified for not agreeing with what the authorities have deemed as “the consensus”. Why are these scientists not allowed to debate on TV? Why cant we see an exchange of views? Maybe they are right, maybe they are wrong. But they surely have my attention when the propaganda machine tries to silence them.
The Measures Don’t Make Any Sense
When a significant portion of the world united under a plan to lockdown for “14 days to slow the spread”, they had my support. I shared the memes, I fact-checked people, I updated my feed. Yes, the fourteen days were going to flatten the curve and then we’d go back to normal or something close to it. But we didn’t.
Many in the conspiracy corners of the web were saying that these measures were here to stay. That we were being programmed. Basically, that the lockdown was a test into compliance and that further and more radical compliance was awaiting down the line. I observed and gave it time. And when the vaccines rolled out, I thought to myself “this is the end of this, we’re going back to normalcy now.” But we didn’t.
Then they began requiring proof of vaccination or a negative COVID test of 72 hours. Then the proof of vax or negative test of 24hr and then only the proof of vax was admitted. That is the actual trend worldwide.
Quarantine camps have been lifted and filled with people. Essential markets have their costumers segregated between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Some doctors and hospitals are letting people die from other diseases since they refuse to see them without a vaccine. And the vaccinated are already being lumped with the non-vaccinated if they don’t have their fourth booster shot. For that reason, the vaccine ID is getting more complex. It is not only evidence of having received the vaccine, but it is a digital mark that must be updated every few months. The conspiracy theorists were right.
Sources: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/20/world/australia/howard-springs-quarantine.html ; https://www.dw.com/en/covid-eu-vaccine-passports-only-valid-9-months-without-booster/a-60204437 ; https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/middleeast/israel-fourth-covid-vaccine-booster-intl/index.html
But maybe these measures are for our own good. Maybe this force is being exercised for our own protection. After all, the unvaccinated cannot be people who are legitimately concerned about the vaccine or about the ethics of the vaccine pass. No, the unvaccinated must be vile people, right-wingers of course, who only care about their own personal freedoms and not about the well being of others. The Ministry of Truth has spoken.
I don’t buy that take though.
Consider this: a business is enacting the measures as mandated by the government. They ask that in that business only vaccinated people OR those with negative COVID test be admitted. Now, we know for a fact that vaccinated people CAN spread the virus. This means that the unvaccinated person that arrives to this business with a negative COVID test is actually less likely to spread the virus than a vaccinated person. Wouldn’t it make more sense to ask for negative COVID test from the vaccinated also?
Is there a real concern for the people or is there an agenda in place to force everybody into Health ID/Passes regardless of the consequences? Seems like the latter. Otherwise, the measures make no sense at all.
Is it not absurd to have people in planes and restaurants with their masks on until they decide to start eating? We all remember the nonsense of a few months ago when people would supposedly take our temperature at the entrances of every shop. Or having us put our hands where hundreds of people have placed them before to squish a sad drop of hand sanitizer out of a bottle. What a joke. At least I’ve seen less of that act now.
Finally,
“The Science” Can Never Tell Us What to Do
Scientists gather data through a rigorous methodology. Then this data is analyzed by humans with individual insights, and theories are formed. Some can be convinced by any given theory and others can challenge it. A study can’t claim absolute authority on any given topic, and any consensus can be challenged because, as I’ve been told hundred of times, the science is constantly changing.
But there is a more important truth that must be considered: scientific data cannot tell us what to do with it. The low fatality rates of COVID 19, the high infection rates, the different effects the virus or the vaccine has on people of different age and sex. None of these factors really tell us what measures to take. Why? Because scientific data cannot tell us what to value.
Some value security more than freedom, others value freedom more than security. Some care for their neighbors by encouraging their safety and others do so by encouraging their freedom. Most, I believe, try to balance freedom and security.
I have read of elderly people who had not seen their family in over a year. Some of them prefer to take the risk and see them while they can. Can science dictate what is more valuable for them? It can’t.
Policies are informed by data but not guided by it. It is morals, values, ethics, ideologies and spirits, which guide our policies. When the government says “science tells us to do this” they lie. Science is only giving them numbers and cold data. Therefore, we must ask which are the beliefs and ideologies guiding their policies. What is their ulterior motive?
To Conclude This
I deeply appreciate science. We have been blessed with incredible medical advancements that have helped us attend so many ills and I am vouching for more of that. However, science without wisdom is dangerous. We should not allow that a vaccine, which should be a blessing, turns into a curse. Let’s make sure that truly sensible measures are in place.
The technocracy, the international interests and the political agents are not unbiased; they do not love, they only desire. And for a very long time we have been warned about excessive control and deception. Moreover, there is proof that we have been lied to. Until when will we fall for their hidden tactics?
A pandemic brings division by its very nature. It strengthens borders and demands order. It separates the stranger from the well-known. But let us keep balance. A truly catastrophic pandemic would call for overwhelming measures and martial law. This, however, is not that one apocalyptic world-ending event… Unless we let it be. More people aged 18 to 45 are dying from fentanyl overdoses than from COVID-19. Just imagine if we get the daily count of fentanyl deaths on the news.
(Yes, SOURCE: https://www.revolt.tv/article/2021-12-18/144931/fentanyl-overdoses-have-killed-more-americans-ages-18-45-than-covid-19/)
Prophets have spoken and have been ignored once again. The Vaccine ID sets a scary precedent of technocratic control unlike anything we have ever seen. The clues point at a future where practically every aspect of our lives will be controlled by an ID Pass. The dystopian world we have imagined for decades is at our door. Will we let it come through? I hope not.
I am not anti-vaccine; I am anti-lies and anti-pass. Let us choose based on our conscience; this is all I ask.
Layman Thought 